Special Service Mustang.net Forums

Go Back   Special Service Mustang.net Forums > Special Service Mustang Tech
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Special Service Mustang Tech Any and all technical questions for SSP cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-27-2013, 02:57 PM
28HopUp's Avatar
28HopUp 28HopUp is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 4,550
Default

ChrisL posted an update on Dan's 86 FHP, as seen here:

http://www.specialservicemustang.net...ead.php?t=4345


Chris just sent me a PDF file of the Marti Report for this car, which I used to create the following page for this SSP in our VIN Project:

http://www.specialservicemustang.net...info248589.htm


Note that this car is near the end of a batch of 60 cars, and that the DSO is #24-0243. There is a one-car gap between this batch and the next batch of 104 cars containing FHP Mustangs with the same DSO. So my question is - Did Ford insert 248593 (if built at all) in-between cars with the same DSO, or is this car actually part of a larger group of cars?
__________________
Bill Jr.

To everyone out there, wherever you are. Remember, the light at the end of the tunnel may be the police chasing you down in their own Mustang!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-27-2013, 05:47 PM
ImEvil1's Avatar
ImEvil1 ImEvil1 is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 28HopUp View Post
Note that this car is near the end of a batch of 60 cars, and that the DSO is #24-0243. There is a one-car gap between this batch and the next batch of 104 cars containing FHP Mustangs with the same DSO. So my question is - Did Ford insert 248593 (if built at all) in-between cars with the same DSO, or is this car actually part of a larger group of cars?
It might be the same type of issue that Mick and I were recently discussing. If there aren't any records, it might not have been included in the consecutive list to begin with. I'm betting that we are talking about one big group of consecutive cars with different order numbers in them.
__________________

Mike

'82 SSP (Marketing Order)
'83 Colorado State Patrol #202
'83 Texas DPS
'85 Florida Highway Patrol #1422
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1187
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1363
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-27-2013, 06:15 PM
FoxChassis FoxChassis is offline
VIN guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,011
Default

I just checked GF248593 with all possible body and engine codes. No records for any of them with either AutoCheck or Carfax. So either Ford didn't build a car with that CUN or it did and that CUN has no manufacture/ship-to record and no registration/inspection/accident/etc records, and therefore has no history to report.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2013, 06:59 AM
28HopUp's Avatar
28HopUp 28HopUp is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 4,550
Default

Interesting! Thanks Mick
__________________
Bill Jr.

To everyone out there, wherever you are. Remember, the light at the end of the tunnel may be the police chasing you down in their own Mustang!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2013, 09:04 AM
1989 Tx DPS SSP's Avatar
1989 Tx DPS SSP 1989 Tx DPS SSP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston.Tx
Posts: 275
Default

Could it be the car was exported. Have you come across any cars, not necessarily SSP that show to have been built for export to other countries.

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-28-2013, 09:15 AM
28HopUp's Avatar
28HopUp 28HopUp is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 4,550
Default

If I were to guess, I'd say that the VIN was never assigned by Ford (as they did with the last 6 VINs in the batch of 400 CHP Mustangs in 1982). Kevin Marti might be able to find out, but I'm not sure the time and effort would be worth it on this VIN.
__________________
Bill Jr.

To everyone out there, wherever you are. Remember, the light at the end of the tunnel may be the police chasing you down in their own Mustang!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2013, 09:32 AM
ImEvil1's Avatar
ImEvil1 ImEvil1 is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 28HopUp View Post
If I were to guess, I'd say that the VIN was never assigned by Ford (as they did with the last 6 VINs in the batch of 400 CHP Mustangs in 1982). Kevin Marti might be able to find out, but I'm not sure the time and effort would be worth it on this VIN.
It would be interesting to know, since we may have more problems with these types of records down the road.
__________________

Mike

'82 SSP (Marketing Order)
'83 Colorado State Patrol #202
'83 Texas DPS
'85 Florida Highway Patrol #1422
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1187
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1363
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.