Special Service Mustang.net Forums

Go Back   Special Service Mustang.net Forums > The Briefing Room
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

The Briefing Room All Non-Mustang related stuff.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2010, 06:31 PM
ImEvil1's Avatar
ImEvil1 ImEvil1 is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,403
Default

Ford is making a huge mistake.

http://www.fordvehicles.com/asp/modu...ptor/video.asp

Nobody liked a FWD Taurus in 1991, and nobody wants one now, either.

Departments across the country are going to be flocking to the new V8 Caprice.
__________________

Mike

'82 SSP (Marketing Order)
'83 Colorado State Patrol #202
'83 Texas DPS
'85 Florida Highway Patrol #1422
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1187
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1363
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-12-2010, 07:13 PM
28HopUp's Avatar
28HopUp 28HopUp is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 4,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImEvil1 View Post
Ford is making a huge mistake.

http://www.fordvehicles.com/asp/modu...ptor/video.asp

Nobody liked a FWD Taurus in 1991, and nobody wants one now, either.

Departments across the country are going to be flocking to the new V8 Caprice.
The 91 was a slow turd. The new PI should be quicker than the current CVPI, get better mileage, and hopefully will be reliable and cheap to maintain. I didn't see what the new PI will retail for, but I know the SHO isn't cheap.
__________________
Bill Jr.

To everyone out there, wherever you are. Remember, the light at the end of the tunnel may be the police chasing you down in their own Mustang!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-12-2010, 08:15 PM
ImEvil1's Avatar
ImEvil1 ImEvil1 is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 28HopUp View Post
The 91 was a slow turd. The new PI should be quicker than the current CVPI, get better mileage, and hopefully will be reliable and cheap to maintain. I didn't see what the new PI will retail for, but I know the SHO isn't cheap.
The '91 was actually not that slow, compared to the '91 CV. I drove both in service. They were unreliable POS's, and the department I worked for at the time only kept them for a year and then dumped them.

The CVPIs now are friggin tanks. I just got an '09 to replace my '05. I also had a "Taurus" for a few months....when it was called a 500.

No, thanks. They will be worse than the Impalas that everyone dislikes and Ford is going to lose out big on this one. Just my humble .02¢ .
__________________

Mike

'82 SSP (Marketing Order)
'83 Colorado State Patrol #202
'83 Texas DPS
'85 Florida Highway Patrol #1422
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1187
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1363
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2010, 08:21 PM
MOstang's Avatar
MOstang MOstang is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 2,994
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImEvil1 View Post
Ford is making a huge mistake.

http://www.fordvehicles.com/asp/modu...ptor/video.asp

Nobody liked a FWD Taurus in 1991, and nobody wants one now, either.
I watched the video of the unveil. It is certainly based upon the new Taurus platform, but did they say that it was going to be front wheel drive. I didn't catch whether that was mentioned.

The following statement should not be regarded as a statement on whether it will be a good LEO car or not...I'm no expert in that regard. Keep in mind the Taurus in the dealer showroom now is not the 500 that was rebranded a "Taurus". In my opinion no comparisions, it's just a diff't car.
__________________
Mike

1992 Michigan State Police SSP Mustang #5114
1993 Wisconsin State Patrol SSP Mustang
1993 Missouri State Highway Patrol SSP Mustang P641

http://members.fotki.com/MOstang/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2010, 08:54 PM
ImEvil1's Avatar
ImEvil1 ImEvil1 is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MOstang View Post
I watched the video of the unveil. It is certainly based upon the new Taurus platform, but did they say that it was going to be front wheel drive. I didn't catch whether that was mentioned.

The following statement should not be regarded as a statement on whether it will be a good LEO car or not...I'm no expert in that regard. Keep in mind the Taurus in the dealer showroom now is not the 500 that was rebranded a "Taurus". In my opinion no comparisions, it's just a diff't car.
It actually is, Mike. The same platform as the previous Taurus and rebadged 500 (and Volvo S80, too).

Ford already had a RWD car they could have brought to the US market, just like what Chevy is doing.
__________________

Mike

'82 SSP (Marketing Order)
'83 Colorado State Patrol #202
'83 Texas DPS
'85 Florida Highway Patrol #1422
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1187
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1363
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2010, 09:21 PM
MOstang's Avatar
MOstang MOstang is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 2,994
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImEvil1 View Post
Ford already had a RWD car they could have brought to the US market, just like what Chevy is doing.
Is that going to be one of the "other" cars they make available to PD's or is that just going to be a 4 wheel drive Explorer type car?
__________________
Mike

1992 Michigan State Police SSP Mustang #5114
1993 Wisconsin State Patrol SSP Mustang
1993 Missouri State Highway Patrol SSP Mustang P641

http://members.fotki.com/MOstang/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-12-2010, 11:12 PM
ImEvil1's Avatar
ImEvil1 ImEvil1 is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MOstang View Post
Is that going to be one of the "other" cars they make available to PD's or is that just going to be a 4 wheel drive Explorer type car?
I'm on my phone so I can't link, but I think it's the Falcon from Australia.
__________________

Mike

'82 SSP (Marketing Order)
'83 Colorado State Patrol #202
'83 Texas DPS
'85 Florida Highway Patrol #1422
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1187
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1363
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-12-2010, 11:42 PM
guerro's Avatar
guerro guerro is offline
Let me see yer war face!
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 169
Default

The two main problems I see with this new Taurus Interceptor are 1) Front wheel drive cars are CRAPPY patrol vehicles. I could list all the standard problems with trying to use a front drive vehicle for patrol, but any of us who have ever tried to use one will understand this fact. 2) I am not sure how many motor pools are going to want to have to deal with a twin turbo charged engine or all-wheel drive. Any cost savings on fuel will be more than offset by maintenence costs.
__________________
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-12-2010, 11:50 PM
guerro's Avatar
guerro guerro is offline
Let me see yer war face!
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 169
Default

Not sure if this was a typo or not but I just read "18 inch vented disc brakes". 18 inch brakes???? not sure the steel wheels on this thing are even that big.
__________________
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-12-2010, 11:50 PM
1jerryl 1jerryl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 132
Default

Actually they mentioned AWD and twin turbos. I am wondering about the reliability of those items. I agree with Mike, I think Chevrolet is going to be right back into the police car business. I dont believe the Impala is being discontinued, so they will have both flavors (FWD & RWD) to choose from. Dodge is also working on a updated Charger. I did find it interesting on the site, the mention of the CV being the car of choice after 1998. Considering GM had gotten out, I think they became the most popular be default. Michigan's annual vehicle tests should be interesting next year, especially if Carbon Motors enters the arena.



Jerry
91 X-CHP
#8990 (For Sale)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.