Special Service Mustang.net Forums

Go Back   Special Service Mustang.net Forums > Agency-Specific Restoration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Agency-Specific Restoration Have an Agency-Specific question? This is the place.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-06-2011, 12:08 AM
Wolfe1013's Avatar
Wolfe1013 Wolfe1013 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 376
Default

This is great!! I was so deflated when they didn't find my Eminger Invoice. At least I can get this to go with the assignment card.

Thanks, Bill.

Greg
__________________
1982 CHP Mustang Coupe, Unit # E870567 **SOLD to chp1982**
1988 Mustang 5.0 LX, Unit # HP 43 (Wyoming Highway Patrol)
1991 Ford Crown Victoria S (Brentwood, CA Police Dept/Cinema Vehicle Svcs)
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS B4C, Unit # 360 (Colorado State Patrol) **SOLD BACK TO CSP**
1996 Bronco XL 5.8L (California Highway Patrol)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-14-2011, 03:26 PM
FoxChassis FoxChassis is offline
VIN guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,011
Default

Wonder if there is a possibility for us to verify if the three previous consecutive VINs to this one were also CHP evaluation, through the same special order # 0187.

Perhaps and inquiry could be made if it is possible to identify how many other P16F VINs were ordered through special order # 0187, without actually obtaining the VINS (to which Marti Auto is not allowed to do, per their legal agreement with Ford), and then to ask if the three previous consecutive VINs were those ordered through # 0187.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-14-2011, 04:09 PM
28HopUp's Avatar
28HopUp 28HopUp is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 4,433
Default

Perhaps this is question is better suited for Kevin Marti, but do you think the STANDARD Marti Reports would provide us with enough confirmation in terms of DSO and SSP options? Those reports are only $15 each, which would be a whole lot easier on the wallet.
__________________
Bill Jr.

To everyone out there, wherever you are. Remember, the light at the end of the tunnel may be the police chasing you down in their own Mustang!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-14-2011, 08:55 PM
FoxChassis FoxChassis is offline
VIN guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,011
Default

Standard report should have the special order number (if applicable) along with the DSO but I haven't seen one yet with anything other than a two-digit DSO so I can't say for sure.

Since the "evaluation" hatchback wasn't an SSP it didn't say "Special Service Package" in the list of equipped features so I would assume the others would be the same.

The very last comment on the reports (the production date, just above Kevin Marti's signature) is different between the Standard Report and the Deluxe Report. Standard only tells you the date. Deluxe tells you the date and whether it was produced ahead of schedule, on time, or behind schedule. So I'm not sure if the same comment "This vehicle was used by the California Highway Patrol for evaluation purposes." would be on the Standard Report.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-27-2012, 11:42 AM
28HopUp's Avatar
28HopUp 28HopUp is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 4,433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxChassis @ FEP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Mu...#CHP_Hatchback

Now I don't know how accurate that Wiki entry is (5 hatchbacks). I also do not know the VINs of any of the other hatchbacks. I do know the VINs of all 400 of the coupes, and the three consecutive VINs immediately after the 400th coupe are P16F (base 5.0L hatchback).

The 400 P10F coupes are 213038 through 213437.

The three P16F hatchbacks immediately following those 400 coupes are

1FABP16F1CF213438
1FABP16F3CF213439
1FABP16FXCF213440

If someone were so inclined to run a Marti Report for some of those hatchbacks we might find something interesting...

In the interest of research, we pulled a Marti Report on the first car after the CUN batch of known 1982 SSP's. We were hoping to confirm whether or not Ford made some hatchbacks for the CHP immediately after running the notchbacks. Attached is the Marti Report.

Spoiler Alert - the first car after the last 1982 SSP was a civilian car that had a 2-digit DSO and did not go to the CHP.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Hatch82-213438marti1.pdf (530.2 KB, 32 views)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-01-2012, 01:27 PM
28HopUp's Avatar
28HopUp 28HopUp is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 4,433
Default

As promised in my recent edit of post #1, here is the revised Deluxe Marti Report for one of the four 1982 CHP hatchbacks...

http://www.specialservicemustang.net...4464marti1.pdf


...which also confirms the CHP hatchback(s) as having been equipped with the SSP option.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-30-2012, 04:49 PM
28HopUp's Avatar
28HopUp 28HopUp is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 4,433
Default

We re-wrote the SSP History page to confirm that the 1982 CHP hatchbacks were equipped with the SSP option -

http://www.specialservicemustang.net/History.html


We also just edited the 1982-1986 Package Content Page to match that -

http://www.specialservicemustang.net/86Package.html


NOW we're consistent!
__________________
Bill Jr.

To everyone out there, wherever you are. Remember, the light at the end of the tunnel may be the police chasing you down in their own Mustang!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-30-2012, 06:24 PM
chp1982 chp1982 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 922
Default

As usual, nice work Bill.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-01-2012, 02:58 AM
FoxChassis FoxChassis is offline
VIN guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 28HopUp View Post
We re-wrote the SSP History page to confirm that the 1982 CHP hatchbacks were equipped with the SSP option -

http://www.specialservicemustang.net/History.html


We also just edited the 1982-1986 Package Content Page to match that -

http://www.specialservicemustang.net/86Package.html


NOW we're consistent!
Bill:

There are some minor details that can be changed/added to the second paragraph (engine) of the SSP Package Content page, if you so desire. Let me know.

As always, excellent job!

Mick
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-01-2012, 09:36 AM
28HopUp's Avatar
28HopUp 28HopUp is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 4,433
Default

Thanks Mick! I welcome your input on the technical aspect (ok, ANY aspect) of the Fox Mustangs. Please edit accordingly and send me a PM with your revisions.

__________________
Bill Jr.

To everyone out there, wherever you are. Remember, the light at the end of the tunnel may be the police chasing you down in their own Mustang!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.