Special Service Mustang.net Forums

Go Back   Special Service Mustang.net Forums > 1982-1986 Special Service Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

1982-1986 Special Service Mustangs The 4-eyed cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-16-2012, 10:58 PM
Mustang Kid's Avatar
Mustang Kid Mustang Kid is offline
Addicted to CHPs/SSPs
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Grants Pass, OR
Posts: 844
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImEvil1 View Post
Where did this information come from?
+1

Yes out in America some officers slightly modified their mustangs(and were reprimanded for it too). If an agency modified the car any way mechanically(headers, brakes, motors, etc), liability dramatically increases. If something happened, like upgraded brake failure and the car rear ended another car causing injury, the department could easily be sued and would lose. CHP is strict on the no modification rule. Even sub frame connectors would be a no no.


These Mustangs are well known for reaching speeds of 130-140 mph.

I have a 92 GT. I haven't had any braking problems, brakes perfectly fine, and handles corners with no problems at all. Of course it has the slightly bigger disks, but still.

I'm sure Ford would have been sued if these cars have had the rear drum lock up issue you describe since they were new as someone would have been injured. Have you redone the brakes? Brake shoes most likely are adjusted too tight. Also, Mustangs do not have Anti-Lock brakes. Of course they are going to lock up if you stand on the brakes.

I'm not trying to bash you. We're just trying to tell you that departments would not swap in new suspensions or modify them. We are a site of preservation and restoration. I'm not opposed to internal motor mods, but when you swap suspension to something newer, the car will not have it's same look. When I see a modified SSP, I don't generally care for it(there are a couple that I really like though). Ruins it's respectability IMO.

Unless you can make contact with every owner, you can't prove that the modifications to the car were put on during it's service life.
__________________

Sam-
1985 CHP #8337
CHP Motor Transport Mustangs
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-21-2012, 09:02 PM
93chipper's Avatar
93chipper 93chipper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 141
Default

there is a shop owner down the street and he said that a few of them had subframe connectors from chp not all of them had them but he has seen them on the cars and he bought a few of them through chp like that
__________________
93 chp unit 5333
polyurathane motor mounts
1.7 roller rockers
typhoon intake, bbk cold air intake, professional products 70tb and egr
c&L 73mm mass air
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-21-2012, 09:23 PM
ImEvil1's Avatar
ImEvil1 ImEvil1 is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,384
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 93chipper View Post
there is a shop owner down the street and he said that a few of them had subframe connectors from chp not all of them had them but he has seen them on the cars and he bought a few of them through chp like that
More than one FHP Trooper told me that his Mustang had a chip in it.

Anything is possible, but we like to verify and document before taking claims at face value.
__________________

Mike

'82 SSP (Marketing Order)
'83 Colorado State Patrol #202
'83 Texas DPS
'85 Florida Highway Patrol #1422
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1187
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1363
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.