Special Service Mustang.net Forums

Go Back   Special Service Mustang.net Forums > The Briefing Room
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

The Briefing Room All Non-Mustang related stuff.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2010, 09:57 PM
guerro's Avatar
guerro guerro is offline
Let me see yer war face!
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 169
Default Interceptor testing at LASO

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/19/f...partment-test/

They also tested the new Explorer against the Tahoe.
__________________
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-20-2010, 02:43 AM
fallon312 fallon312 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Palm Springs Ca.
Posts: 41
Default Testing

I attended the testing yesterday at the Fontana Race track. I was able to look at , sit in and evaluate all three cars. I brought five various size officers with me and some guys from our shop. After approximately three hours of climbing in and out evaluating the front seats, back seats suspension and a great deal of other specs the Dodge was hands down the better vehicle. Chevy should not have even brought their caprice. The Ford was just toooooo small. IMO
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-21-2010, 12:34 PM
guerro's Avatar
guerro guerro is offline
Let me see yer war face!
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fallon312 View Post
The Ford was just toooooo small. IMO
I think this is what we all here were saying from when we first saw the Taurus announcement a while back. That and not sure about a twin turbo engine in a patrol vehicle. That is too bad. I am a huge fan of Ford's current line up. Guess we will have to wait and see how things shake out. It almost feels to me like Ford didn't even really try.
__________________
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-21-2010, 12:35 PM
guerro's Avatar
guerro guerro is offline
Let me see yer war face!
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 169
Default

http://www.thefordstory.com/our-plan...olice-testing/
__________________
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-21-2010, 05:24 PM
NoDrama43's Avatar
NoDrama43 NoDrama43 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,043
Default

Ford interceptor=FWD crap

Ford will regret this. The testing article above is nothing more than them tooting their own horn. Cops DON'T and WON'T like it.
__________________
Jim


for the first time since 1998 there is only two left:

1984 Oregon SP unmarked
1986 Idaho SP
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-21-2010, 11:50 PM
guerro's Avatar
guerro guerro is offline
Let me see yer war face!
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoDrama43 View Post
Ford interceptor=FWD crap

Ford will regret this. The testing article above is nothing more than them tooting their own horn. Cops DON'T and WON'T like it.
there is an AWD option, I believe. But yes, FWD would make up the bulk of cars.
__________________
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-22-2010, 12:23 AM
ImEvil1's Avatar
ImEvil1 ImEvil1 is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,384
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guerro View Post
there is an AWD option, I believe. But yes, FWD would make up the bulk of cars.
True. No one I have talked to wants this crap. GSA will probably buy a shit ton of them, but for driving back and forth to work and the occasional op, they'll be fine. For actual patrol work and jumping curbs (read: longevity), I think they'll be total POS's.

I'm glad I have a Crown Vic with 12k on it...it'll be mine for awhile.
__________________

Mike

'82 SSP (Marketing Order)
'83 Colorado State Patrol #202
'83 Texas DPS
'85 Florida Highway Patrol #1422
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1187
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1363
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.