View Single Post
  #28  
Old 03-30-2011, 05:32 PM
copcamaro's Avatar
copcamaro copcamaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Jefferson City, Mo. 65109
Posts: 57
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImEvil1 View Post
+1. Glad to see you guys get out what you neeeded to and still remain as civil as you did. I was also monitoring it, but one of the best things about this website is what was displayed in this thread (and the one from the other day, too). People are free to share differing opinions and participate in intelligent discussions on a variety of issues, without it turning into a major mess.

Ray,

I hope you will continue to participate here; especially since you are one of the "original" SSP guys (a little birdie told me who you were this afternoon).

We won't hold the Camaro in your username against you.
Yes, I did start off with a MSHP 89 SSP in 1990 which I used when I was Deputy in our little Co. I then sold it and graduated to a 90 and then to a 93.
All these were purshased directly from MSHP with less or exactly 50 k miles.
At that time they only sold to L.E.O's, municipal govts not to public.
I wish I knew who now owns my Grey 93 as it was an absolute peach. I sold it to a guy in Ma. and hoped he would give me a chance to buy it back if he ever decided to sell it. Just lost track of it, and the guy I sold it to.
Strangley enough, the MSHP troopers # was MSHP 666.
So if any one see that plate # at a show out east, please let me know!
It had only 60 plus miles when I sold it. Was perfect as far as body and paint.
My only complaint on the SSP's was, front disc's and rear drums for brakes.
Got a few scares running code.
Now about the Camaro, this my 4th Camaro and it only has 62k miles.
Reply With Quote